In a surprising turn of events, Afe Babalola, the renowned Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), has announced his readiness to withdraw the criminal defamation lawsuit he filed against prominent rights activist, Dele Farotimi. This decision comes after an influential intervention by the Ooni of Ife, Oba Adeyeye Ogunwusi, and other prominent Yoruba traditional rulers.
The move marks a significant shift in a high-profile case that had stirred tensions within Nigeria’s legal and political circles. Farotimi’s book, Nigeria and Its Criminal Justice System, had triggered the suit when Babalola accused the author of tarnishing his reputation with defamatory statements. The legal battle had already led to Farotimi’s arrest in Lagos in December, followed by his detention for 21 days in an Ado Ekiti Magistrates’ Court, where he was granted bail on December 24, 2024, in the amount of N30 million.
The breakthrough came late Sunday night, as the Ooni of Ife led a delegation of top Yoruba traditional rulers to Afe Babalola’s residence at Afe Babalola University (ABUAD) in Ado Ekiti. The royal visit, which began at approximately 10:30 pm, aimed to mediate a peaceful resolution to the escalating conflict.
The Ooni, accompanied by the Ewi of Ado-Ekiti, Ogoga of Ikere-Ekiti, the Oloye of Oye-Ekiti, and other first-class traditional rulers, expressed their concern over the implications of the case for the unity and peace of the Yoruba community. “As leaders of the Yoruba people, we are watching this development closely, and we believe it is in the best interest of all parties to reconcile,” the Ooni remarked during the closed-door meeting.
A Reluctant Decision: Why Babalola Chose Peace
Addressing the royal visitors and dignitaries gathered at his home, Babalola explained that he had received numerous appeals from influential figures, including former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo and Bishop Matthew Kukah, urging him to reconsider the defamation suit.
“I have received several letters and calls from eminent Nigerians pleading with me to withdraw the case. I must admit that I have no personal interest in seeing Farotimi imprisoned. His book may have caused harm to my reputation, but I do not wish to see him suffer unjustly,” Babalola said, visibly moved by the appeals.
The seasoned lawyer and philanthropist acknowledged the gravity of the situation, pointing out that he had long been dedicated to upholding the law but also recognized the power of forgiveness in maintaining societal peace. “I have built my career on integrity and fairness. I do not wish for a prolonged legal battle over this. It’s time for healing,” Babalola added.
Traditional Rulers’ Mediation: The Role of the Ooni and Yoruba Leaders
The Ooni, who has long been an advocate for the preservation of cultural values and the promotion of peace within the Yoruba community, emphasized the importance of unity. “We must not allow this legal dispute to tear us apart. It is our responsibility as traditional rulers to ensure that our people are not divided by misunderstandings. Babalola has built a legacy of respect, and we believe he will do what is right for the larger good,” he stated.
The royal intervention was not only a call for reconciliation but also a statement about the role of the Yoruba traditional institution in resolving conflicts. The meeting between the elders lasted until past midnight, with the consensus being that Babalola should find a way to pardon Farotimi, a view strongly supported by other prominent figures at the gathering.
Babalola, who is also the founder of Afe Babalola University, one of Nigeria’s premier institutions, is known for his advocacy for legal reform and his stance on national issues. Despite his initial resolve to pursue the case, he appeared to soften his position after the intervention by the Yoruba leaders.
Farotimi’s Arrest: A Tale of Controversy and Legal Action
The conflict between Babalola and Farotimi began after the publication of Farotimi’s book, which critiqued Nigeria’s criminal justice system, making allegations against several prominent figures, including Babalola. The book’s controversial contents, which painted Babalola in a negative light, led to the filing of a criminal defamation suit by the legal icon in October 2024.
Following the suit, Farotimi faced an intense legal battle, with his arrest in Lagos by the Ekiti State Police in December marking the beginning of his detention. The legal ramifications of the case sparked widespread public interest and debate, with many civil society organizations and human rights activists rallying behind Farotimi. His eventual release on bail came after significant public outcry and mounting pressure from supporters.
The episode further complicated the relationship between Nigeria’s legal community and activists advocating for judicial reforms. Farotimi, who is known for his outspoken stance on human rights and governance issues, had garnered both support and criticism for his blunt approach in addressing Nigeria’s judicial shortcomings.
A Landmark Moment for Legal Reconciliation
Babalola’s decision to withdraw the defamation suit is being hailed as a moment of profound reconciliation and wisdom. Legal experts believe that the case could have set a dangerous precedent for the treatment of public figures who feel their reputations are under threat.
“While Babalola was well within his legal rights to pursue the defamation suit, his decision to withdraw it demonstrates a mature understanding of the complexities involved in a case of this nature,” said a prominent legal analyst. “It’s a recognition that the law can be used not only for justice but for reconciliation and national unity.”
Babalola’s withdrawal of the suit also underscores the role of traditional leaders in Nigeria, who continue to serve as mediators in conflicts, particularly in matters that have the potential to divide communities.
Looking Forward: The Importance of Peaceful Resolutions
The resolution of this high-profile defamation case also raises important questions about the role of traditional rulers in modern Nigeria’s legal landscape. The Ooni’s involvement is a reminder of the power that cultural institutions hold in fostering dialogue and maintaining peace in a country often torn by political, ethnic, and legal disputes.
Babalola’s decision to let go of the legal action is seen as a triumph for dialogue over discord, a moment when Nigeria’s rich tradition of mediation by elders helped bring about an end to a potentially bitter dispute.
“I will instruct my lawyers to withdraw the case,” Babalola confirmed, much to the relief of those gathered. “It’s time for us all to move forward in peace.”
