Activist lawyer and political commentator, Deji Adeyanju, has criticized former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami, claiming that the former top government lawyer has been “reduced to nothing” by karma. Adeyanju’s comments come as Malami and his son remain in Kuje Medium Security Prison pending bail decisions in a high-profile corruption case.
Adeyanju made his remarks on the social media platform X, where he accused Malami of disregarding the rule of law while serving as AGF. “Malami didn’t believe in rule of law even as a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and didn’t obey several court orders as AGF,” Adeyanju wrote. He added, “Look at him today, reduced to absolutely nothing by karma. Those in power always forget they will soon be out of power.”
The former Attorney General, who held one of the most powerful legal positions in Nigeria, is currently facing trial alongside two other defendants over alleged misappropriation of N9 billion. The case is being prosecuted by the federal government, and the defendants are accused of diverting public funds for personal use.
On Friday, Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court in Abuja heard arguments regarding bail applications for Malami, his son, and a co-defendant. The judge subsequently ordered that the three remain in Kuje prison until January 7, when their bail requests will be formally considered.
Abubakar Malami served as Nigeria’s Attorney General and Minister of Justice from 2015 to 2023. During his tenure, he was one of the country’s most influential legal figures, responsible for overseeing prosecutions, advising the federal government on legal matters, and ensuring that court rulings were enforced.
However, Malami’s time in office was often controversial. Critics alleged that he sometimes failed to uphold the rule of law, including accusations that he did not always comply with court orders. Adeyanju’s recent comments reflect a broader public sentiment among some activists and opposition voices, who argue that Malami wielded his office to protect political interests rather than serve justice impartially.
As AGF, Malami’s office was involved in several high-profile legal cases, including corruption prosecutions and electoral disputes. Despite his status as a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), one of the nation’s highest legal ranks, his critics say he occasionally appeared selective in enforcing legal decisions, especially when they affected powerful individuals.
Malami’s current legal challenges mark a dramatic shift from his time as one of the country’s most powerful legal officers. Alongside his son, Malami faces accusations of embezzling public funds, specifically N9 billion allegedly misappropriated during his tenure. The case is being closely watched by the public, media, and legal community, given Malami’s prominence in Nigeria’s legal and political landscape.
The court has restricted the former AGF and his co-defendants from being released until January 7, when their bail applications will be reconsidered. Justice Emeka Nwite presided over the proceedings and emphasized the need for careful examination of the arguments for and against granting bail.
Reactions to Adeyanju’s statements have been mixed. Supporters of the activist have praised him for speaking out against what they see as a lack of accountability among Nigeria’s elite. They argue that Malami’s current situation demonstrates that political power is temporary and that individuals who ignore the law may eventually face consequences.
Others, however, caution against public vilification, emphasizing that Malami is entitled to a fair trial and due process. Legal experts point out that comments on social media, while reflective of public opinion, should not influence the judicial process or prejudge the outcome of the ongoing case.
Adeyanju’s criticism of Malami taps into wider debates about the rule of law in Nigeria. Many activists and citizens argue that respect for court orders and judicial independence are essential for the country’s democratic development. High-profile cases like Malami’s serve as litmus tests for the country’s ability to hold powerful figures accountable.
“The rule of law is not optional for public officers,” said a legal analyst who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Whether you are the Attorney General or a junior official, compliance with court orders is mandatory. When those in power ignore legal obligations, it undermines public trust and confidence in governance.”