The Federal High Court in Lagos has dismissed a N200 million fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by popular Nigerian crossdresser, Okuneye Idris Olanrewaju, widely known as Bobrisky.
Justice Alexander Owoeye delivered the ruling on Thursday, November 28, 2024.
Bobrisky had sued the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), seeking an injunction to stop the anti-graft agency from harassing, arresting, or detaining him.
He also demanded N200 million in damages, claiming the EFCC had infringed on his fundamental rights.
Justice Owoeye, however, struck out the case, stating that the claims lacked merit.
“There is insufficient evidence before this Court to support the Applicant’s allegations of rights violations,” the judge declared.
He added that Bobrisky failed to prove the EFCC acted unlawfully in its dealings with him.
The judge ruled that awarding damages or issuing an injunction against the EFCC was not justified.
“Without credible evidence, this Court cannot grant the declaratory and injunctive reliefs sought,” Justice Owoeye concluded.
The court’s decision marked a significant blow to Bobrisky, who had also named the National Assembly as a respondent in the case.
All reliefs sought by the crossdresser were thrown out.
Background of the Case
Bobrisky’s legal battle with the EFCC began after his arrest on April 4, 2024.
The arrest was reportedly linked to allegations of naira abuse.
Following the arrest, Bobrisky was convicted by Justice Abimbola Awogboro of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos.
The court sentenced him to six months in prison on April 12, 2024.
Bobrisky’s Demands and Court’s Response
In his suit, Bobrisky requested a perpetual injunction restraining the EFCC from any further harassment or detention.
He insisted that the anti-graft agency had no right to interfere with his freedom.
“I have suffered emotional distress and public humiliation because of the EFCC’s actions,” Bobrisky had argued in court documents.
However, the court found his arguments unconvincing.
Justice Owoeye emphasized that the EFCC’s actions were within the bounds of the law.
“The Commission acted within its statutory powers,” he said.
The judge further noted that Bobrisky did not provide any evidence to show that his rights were deliberately violated.
Reactions to the Judgment
The court’s ruling has sparked widespread reactions, with many weighing in on social media.
Some applauded the decision, emphasizing the importance of accountability.
“Bobrisky should know that no one is above the law,” a Twitter user commented.
Others expressed sympathy, noting that the case highlighted issues of personal rights and dignity.
“This is not just about Bobrisky. It’s about standing up for one’s rights,” another user posted.
