The Federal High Court in Abuja has set January 13 as the date to hear a N300 million lawsuit filed by singer and internet sensation, Darlington Achakpo, better known as Speed Darlington, against the Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun. This case stems from allegations of unlawful arrest, detention, and rights violations.
Justice Musa Liman adjourned proceedings during a session on Monday after the singer’s counsel, Abubakar Marshal, requested time for the Inspector-General’s legal team, led by Garba Audu, to review documents served in court.
The lawsuit follows a dramatic series of events involving Speed Darlington’s detention, which his legal team claims violated his fundamental rights.
A Detention Drama Unfolds
Speed Darlington, 39, became embroiled in legal troubles after his arrest on October 4, 2024, for alleged defamation and cyberstalking of Grammy-winning Nigerian superstar Damini Ogulu, popularly known as Burna Boy. Human rights activist Deji Adeyanju claimed that Burna Boy had filed a petition, prompting the police to detain Darlington in Lagos before transferring him to Abuja.
Despite being released on bail on October 8, 2024, Speed Darlington found himself back in police custody on November 27, allegedly for “jumping administrative bail.”
Justice Liman Intervenes
On December 23, 2024, Justice Liman intervened, ordering the police to either charge Speed Darlington to court or release him unconditionally within 48 hours. However, the police argued that holiday disruptions and procedural challenges delayed compliance.
Police counsel Garba Audu explained, “The criminal matter against Mr. Achakpo has already been filed and is scheduled for January 15 before Justice Ekerete Akpan. Contrary to claims, the police have not deliberately flouted court orders.”
Justice Liman urged the police to release Speed Darlington temporarily, advising, “I don’t see anything the police will lose if he is granted bail.”
The Lawsuit in Focus
Speed Darlington is seeking four key remedies in his fundamental rights enforcement suit, including:
- A declaration that his arrest and detention were unconstitutional.
- An immediate and unconditional release from custody.
- Compensation of N300 million for damages, citing the inhumane conditions of his detention.
- An inquiry into the legality of his continued detention.
The suit, supported by an affidavit from Esther Eyisi, a secretary at the law firm representing Darlington, alleges severe mistreatment during the singer’s initial five-day detention. “He was subjected to torture and denied due process,” Eyisi claimed.
Accusations Fly
The affidavit further alleges that Speed Darlington’s medical emergencies and prior police permission to travel for a performance in Owerri were ignored, leading to his re-arrest. “This continuous detention is unlawful and undermines his role as the breadwinner of his family,” Eyisi argued.
However, the police countered with claims that Darlington had failed to comply with bail conditions. Audu told the court, “The singer was granted administrative bail but failed to appear as required, necessitating further action.”
Public Reaction and Context
This legal battle has sparked intense debate about the intersection of celebrity culture, legal accountability, and fundamental rights in Nigeria. Speed Darlington, known for his outspokenness and eccentricity, has garnered significant public support. Many view his case as emblematic of the broader issue of police overreach and abuse of power.
The backdrop of this controversy—his alleged defamation of Burna Boy—adds another layer of intrigue. The two artists have long had a contentious relationship, with Darlington often criticizing Burna Boy publicly.
Legal experts note that this case highlights the importance of due process. “Every citizen, regardless of status, deserves to have their rights upheld,” said human rights lawyer Deji Adeyanju, who has been vocal in defending Speed Darlington.
What’s Next?
With the next hearing scheduled for January 13, all eyes are on Justice Liman’s court. The stakes are high: the outcome could either reinforce the rights of Nigerian citizens against perceived police excesses or set a precedent for stricter enforcement of administrative bail conditions.
Speed Darlington’s legal team remains optimistic. Marshal stated, “We trust the judiciary to uphold justice and ensure that no individual’s rights are trampled upon.”
Meanwhile, the Inspector-General’s team insists they have acted within the bounds of the law. “The police followed due procedure and remain committed to the rule of law,” Audu reiterated.
