A civic group, Democracy Watch Initiative (DWI), has strongly criticised former Vice President Atiku Abubakar for calling for the unconditional release of the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.
The group expressed concern that Atiku’s comment could weaken public confidence in the rule of law and send the wrong message about accountability in Nigeria.
In a statement issued on Thursday by its Director of Strategic Communication, Dr Tunji Bamidele, DWI said Atiku’s position appeared to contradict his past record of advocating for justice, democracy, and national unity.
“Nnamdi Kanu is currently facing serious charges, including terrorism and treasonable felony, which involve allegations of incitement to violence and the destruction of public and private property,” the statement read.
“These are matters before the court, and the legal process should be allowed to run its course. By calling for Kanu’s unconditional release, there is a risk of undermining the judicial process and the efforts of those working to maintain peace and security.”
Atiku, who was the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2023 elections, had recently urged the Federal Government to free Kanu without conditions, citing national reconciliation and peace.
But DWI said such a move could be misinterpreted by the public as promoting impunity and disrespect for the justice system.
The group further urged Atiku to reconsider his stance in the interest of national cohesion and respect for the legal process.
“As a statesman and experienced leader, Atiku should be careful not to make statements that may erode the rule of law or embolden actions that threaten Nigeria’s unity and security,” the group added.
Nnamdi Kanu has been in detention since June 2021 after he was extradited from Kenya. He is currently facing trial for charges related to terrorism and incitement. His case has continued to stir political and ethnic debates, especially in the South-East, where IPOB enjoys significant support.
The Federal Government has maintained that his release can only be determined by the courts.
