The Abia State Government has introduced a controversial tax policy that mandates churches to pay taxes on their signposts.
This decision has sparked an outcry from the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Abia State chapter, which has condemned the move as unfair and anti-religious.
In a statement released on Tuesday, CAN called on the state government to reconsider the tax, warning that it could be seen as a direct attack on the church.
The introduction of the tax on church signposts has drawn significant attention and criticism from religious leaders across the state.
Many have expressed concern that this new policy is not only burdensome but also unjust, as churches are non-profit institutions dedicated to serving the spiritual needs of the community.
CAN, the umbrella body representing Christians in the country, did not mince words in its statement.
They urged the Abia State Government to reverse the tax policy immediately, arguing that it could damage the relationship between the church and the state.
“We are deeply troubled by this decision,” the CAN statement read.
“It gives the impression that the government is becoming anti-church, and this could erode the trust and goodwill that exist between the government and religious institutions.”
The statement went on to say that churches play a vital role in society, providing moral guidance, charity, and community services, and should not be burdened with such taxes.
CAN’s call for action has resonated with many Christian leaders and followers in the state.
Several church leaders have also voiced their disapproval, claiming that the tax is unnecessary and will strain their finances.
A Christian, who wished to remain anonymous, described the tax as “a clear overreach by the government.”
He said, “Churches are here to serve the people, not to be exploited. This is nothing but a revenue-generating scheme that targets religious institutions.”
The new tax policy has created confusion and frustration among church leaders, many of whom are unsure of how the tax will be calculated or enforced.
There is also concern about the potential ripple effect on smaller churches that may struggle to afford the additional costs.
The association has warned that if the state government does not withdraw the tax policy, churches may begin to perceive the administration as hostile to their interests.
“This is a very sensitive issue for the Christian community,” said a spokesperson for CAN.
“We are calling on the government to act quickly and responsibly. The church has always been a partner in development, and we hope the government will not jeopardize that relationship.”
Many churchgoers in Abia State have also expressed their frustration with the new tax.
Some view it as a betrayal of the government’s responsibility to support religious freedom and protect the rights of churches.
The tension between the church and the government is particularly significant in a state like Abia, where religion plays a central role in daily life.
Churches are not only places of worship but also serve as community hubs, providing support for education, healthcare, and social services.
In fact, many churches in Abia State run schools, hospitals, and food distribution programs, offering vital assistance to the less privileged.
It is against this backdrop that CAN’s opposition to the tax has gained widespread support.
