Human rights activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore has spoken out in support of former Kaduna State governor Nasir El-Rufai, criticising what he described as the misuse of legal processes in the handling of El-Rufai’s case.
Sowore made his position known in a post shared on his official social media page, where he raised concerns about what he called the growing use of legal tools as a means of intimidation.
According to him, there are indications that “lawfare” — a term used to describe the use of legal systems to achieve political or personal aims — may be at play in the situation involving El-Rufai.
He argued that the justice system must not be used to target or harass individuals, regardless of their political background or public standing.
“Bail is a constitutional right, not a tool for punishment or intimidation,” Sowore said.
He stressed that bail conditions should not be used in a way that unfairly restricts individuals or denies them their rights. According to him, such practices weaken public trust in the justice system and go against the principles of fairness and equality before the law.
Sowore further called on the courts to remain independent and uphold the rule of law by ensuring that all individuals are treated fairly. He urged judicial authorities to grant bail where necessary and to avoid imposing conditions that may appear excessive or unjust.
However, concerns have been raised in recent years about how bail conditions are applied, especially in high-profile cases involving politicians, activists, or public figures.
Some critics argue that strict or unusual bail terms can be used to limit a person’s freedom beyond what is necessary, effectively punishing them before they are found guilty.
Sowore’s comments reflect these concerns, as he warned that using bail as a form of pressure could damage the credibility of the justice system.
He added that fairness must be the guiding principle in all legal proceedings, noting that justice should not depend on who is involved.
“This is not about personalities. It is about upholding the law and ensuring that everyone is treated equally,” he said.
The case involving El-Rufai has attracted public attention, given his role as a former governor and a prominent political figure. During his time in office, he was known for his strong views and active involvement in national issues.
Since leaving office, El-Rufai has remained a key voice in political discussions, making any legal matter involving him a subject of public interest.
While details of the case and the specific bail conditions have not been fully disclosed, the situation has sparked debate about the balance between enforcing the law and protecting individual rights.
In recent times, there have been similar debates involving other public figures, where critics have accused authorities of using legal procedures to silence or pressure opponents.
On the other hand, some argue that the law must be allowed to take its course without interference, and that all individuals, regardless of status, should be held accountable if they are accused of wrongdoing.
Sowore, who has also had his own experiences with the legal system, has often been vocal about the need for judicial reforms and respect for human rights.
His latest comments are in line with his long-standing advocacy for transparency, accountability, and the protection of civil liberties.
For many Nigerians, the key concern remains the fairness and integrity of the legal process. There is a growing demand for a system that treats everyone equally and protects the rights of both the accused and the victims.
As discussions continue, legal practitioners and civil society groups are expected to keep a close watch on how cases like El-Rufai’s are handled.
They stress that maintaining public confidence in the justice system is essential for democracy and the rule of law.
Sowore concluded by urging Nigerians to remain alert and to speak out against any form of injustice, regardless of who is affected.
He maintained that the misuse of legal processes should be rejected, warning that allowing such practices to continue could weaken democratic institutions.
The development has once again brought attention to the role of the courts and the importance of ensuring that justice is not only done but also seen to be done.