APC Jabs Obi as ‘Political Rolling Stone’

0
10

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has taken a swipe at former presidential candidate Peter Obi following his resignation from the African Democratic Congress (ADC), describing his political moves as unstable and self-serving.

In a statement shared on Sunday via social media, the APC National Publicity Secretary, Felix Morka, accused Obi of constantly moving from one political party to another in search of what he called an “easy path” to the presidency.

Morka described the former Anambra State governor as a “political rolling stone,” suggesting that Obi lacks the patience and commitment required to build a political party from within.

“Peter Obi, a political rolling stone that gathers no moss… roaming again in search of free, uncontested, unchallenged presidential ticket… never willing to remain to build any party,” Morka wrote.

Advertisement

He went further to allege that Obi prefers political arrangements where he does not have to face strong internal competition. According to him, the former governor is more interested in being handed a presidential ticket than earning it through party structures.

Related Posts

“He fantasises to be president on a ticket delivered only on a platter of gold,” Morka added, listing Obi’s political journey through different parties including the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the Labour Party (LP), and most recently, the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

The APC spokesman ended his remarks with a harsh tone, calling Obi a “political drifter” and wishing him well in what he suggested was yet another political move.

“Fare thee well, Nigeria’s inconsolable political drifter,” he said.

However, Obi has defended his decision to leave the African Democratic Congress, saying it was based on careful thought and concern about the state of the party.

In a statement released on Sunday, Obi said the ADC had been facing serious internal crises that were affecting its ability to focus on national issues. He described the situation as a “toxic political environment” marked by disputes and divisions.

According to him, these internal problems made it difficult for the party to function effectively or present a united front to Nigerians.

“My decision followed deep reflection on the current challenges within the party, including internal disputes that have continued to distract from the real issues affecting Nigerians,” Obi said.

He stressed that his resignation was not due to personal conflict with key figures in the party, including former Senate President David Mark and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. Obi noted that he still holds both men in high regard.

Responding indirectly to the APC’s criticism, Obi rejected claims that he is desperate to become president. He insisted that his political actions are guided by his desire to improve the lives of Nigerians, not by personal ambition.

“I am not desperate for any political office,” he said. “My focus remains on how to contribute to building a better society where leadership works for the people.”

Related Posts

Obi also used the opportunity to restate his belief that Nigeria can still achieve good governance with the right leadership. He said the country needs leaders who are both competent and compassionate.

Despite leaving the ADC, Obi said he remains committed to the vision of a better Nigeria and will continue to work toward that goal.

The criticism from the APC highlights a long-standing issue in Nigerian politics—frequent party switching by politicians. Over the years, many political figures have moved between parties, often citing internal disagreements or lack of fairness in party processes.

Obi himself has had a notable political journey. He first rose to prominence under the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), where he served as governor of Anambra State. He later moved to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), where he became the running mate to Atiku Abubakar in the 2019 presidential election.

Ahead of the 2023 election, Obi left the PDP and joined the Labour Party, where he emerged as the party’s presidential candidate. His campaign attracted significant support, especially among young Nigerians, and introduced a new level of competition into the political landscape.

His recent association with the ADC was seen by some analysts as part of ongoing efforts to build alliances ahead of future elections. However, his sudden exit has raised questions about the stability of such political arrangements.

By portraying Obi as inconsistent, the APC may be trying to reduce his credibility among voters. The party has often argued that strong leadership requires stability and long-term commitment, qualities it claims Obi lacks.

At the same time, critics of the APC argue that party switching is common across all major parties in Nigeria, including the ruling party itself.

Reactions to the development have been mixed. Supporters of Obi have defended his decision, saying he has the right to leave any political platform that no longer aligns with his vision.

Some believe his exit from the ADC shows integrity, arguing that staying in a troubled party would have been more damaging.

On the other hand, critics agree with the APC’s position, saying frequent party changes can create doubts about a politician’s consistency and long-term plans.

The latest exchange between the APC and Obi reflects the ongoing tension in Nigeria’s political space as parties and individuals begin to position themselves for future elections.

Issues such as internal party democracy, leadership credibility, and the ability to deliver good governance remain central to public debate.

For many Nigerians, the focus is less on party loyalty and more on results. With economic challenges, insecurity, and governance concerns still affecting daily life, voters are increasingly demanding practical solutions rather than political rhetoric.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, Obi’s next move will be closely watched. Whether he joins another party or helps form a new coalition, his influence—especially among younger voters—remains significant.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here