In a powerful call to action, Chief Edwin Clark, a respected elder statesman and leader of the Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF), has urged the immediate suspension of the Nigerian Governors’ Forum (NGF), accusing the body of deviating from its original purpose and contributing to the erosion of good governance in Nigeria. His call, made public through an open letter on Monday, echoes deep concerns about the future of Nigeria’s political institutions.
Clark, renowned for his outspoken stance on national issues, expressed his disappointment over the NGF’s transformation into what he described as a “notorious cabal,” more focused on consolidating political power than fostering inter-state collaboration and dialogue, the very principles that led to the formation of the body.
A Noble Beginning Gone Astray
When the NGF was first established, its intent was clear: to create a platform for cooperation and dialogue among state governors aimed at advancing governance across Nigeria. According to Clark, the forum was meant to bridge the gap between the federal and state governments, ensuring that policies and strategies were aligned for the betterment of the country. However, Clark argued, the NGF has strayed far from this noble purpose.
He emphasized, “The NGF was created to harmonize governance practices and serve as a bridge between the tiers of government. Instead, it has morphed into a bloc capable of challenging the federal executive, manipulating the legislature, and stifling local government autonomy.”
Clark’s strong words highlight the growing frustration with the Forum’s shift towards becoming a self-interested power block that seeks to dominate the national political landscape, rather than serve as a collaborative force for national progress.
NGF’s Impact on Legislative Independence
One of Clark’s most serious accusations against the NGF concerns its alleged undermining of legislative independence at both state and federal levels. In his letter, Clark accused state governors of reducing their State Assemblies to “mere extensions of their administrations,” manipulating legislative processes to maintain their power.
“Governors have handpicked speakers and punished dissenting members to stifle independent thought within their states,” Clark charged. He pointed to the pervasive influence that governors hold over the legislative arms of their states, warning that this dominance inhibits the necessary checks and balances in governance.
At the federal level, Clark noted how the political career trajectory of many state governors has shifted towards the Senate, turning the upper house into what he described as a “retirement plan” for governors once their time in office ends. He lamented that this trend perpetuates a cycle of political control, where personal interests are prioritized over the greater good of the nation.
“How can we rebuild these institutions to function as true checks and balances when they remain tethered to the whims of the governors?” Clark questioned in his letter.
A Call for Immediate Suspension
In light of these growing concerns, Clark made a clear demand: the immediate suspension of the NGF. He warned that failure to act decisively could lead to even greater political crises, further destabilizing an already fragile system. His call for suspension is not one of complete dissolution, but rather a temporary halt to allow for much-needed restructuring.
“I strongly advise the suspension of the Governors’ Forum from now in order to avert the looming crises between the various governments,” Clark stated, underlining the urgency of his position.
He further suggested that a complete overhaul of the NGF’s structure and purpose is essential to realign it with constitutional principles. The NGF, according to Clark, should focus on fostering genuine collaboration between the tiers of government rather than seeking to control the entire political system.
Reform, Not an Indictment
Despite his harsh criticism, Clark did not completely dismiss the possibility of reforming the NGF. In fact, he expressed hope that the body could yet serve a positive role in Nigeria’s democracy if it underwent significant changes.
“Reform is not an indictment; it is an opportunity,” Clark asserted, emphasizing that the suspension of the NGF should be seen as a chance to recalibrate the body’s role in governance. Rather than perpetuating political influence, the reformed NGF should focus on advancing democracy, promoting good governance, and addressing the real needs of the Nigerian people.
“This is a chance to recommit and to rebuild,” Clark added, urging Nigerians to hold their political leaders accountable and demand the kind of leadership that truly serves the nation.
A Vision for a Reformed NGF
While calling for the suspension of the NGF, Clark presented a vision for a reconstituted Forum that could play a constructive role in Nigeria’s governance. He envisions a platform where governors collaborate based on shared principles of democracy and the well-being of the populace, rather than for personal or political gain.
Clark’s hope for a new NGF contrasts sharply with the current reality of the body, which many critics, including Clark, view as more of a political tool used by state governors to consolidate power. However, the PANDEF leader’s belief in the potential for reform signals a glimmer of optimism in the midst of the governance challenges facing the country.
What’s Next for Nigeria’s Governance Structures?
The call for the suspension of the NGF adds to the growing list of concerns regarding Nigeria’s political framework, with critics pointing to the overwhelming influence of governors in national decision-making. The existing political structure, some argue, has failed to balance the interests of the federal government with those of state and local governments, leading to inefficiencies, corruption, and an erosion of democratic norms.
Clark’s call to action could set the stage for a broader conversation about governance reform in Nigeria, especially in the context of the upcoming political seasons. As the country grapples with deepening political crises and calls for institutional reforms, it remains to be seen whether the NGF will heed Clark’s warnings and take steps to realign itself with its original purpose.
